Join us on Facebook
Become a GFWA member

Site Announcements

Invitation to RPS SAVANA Allottees to join Case in NCDRC against RPS Infrastructures Ltd


Have you submitted a rating and reviewed your project?
Rate & Review your project now! Submit your project and review.
Read Reviews! Share your feedback!


** Enhanced EDC Stayed by High Court **

Forum email notifications...Please read !
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to Noida
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to GGN


Advertise with us

All RTI related information

RTI doesn't trample upon privacy:Expert Panel

Postby dheerajjain » Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:35 am

Admist talk of UPA Govt. trying to dilute RTI act in garb of privacy, expert panel has said that RTI act does not trample privacy. My personal experience also tells that there are enough checks and regulations in existing RTI act to take care of privacy.

Source: Hindustan Times, 29-Oct-12
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-new ... 51471.aspx

Government officials riding high on hopes that privacy concerns could blunt the right to information are in for disappointment. An expert panel set up to build a framework for a privacy regulation in India has brushed aside suggestions that the information law was trampling upon privacy of public servants or individuals in public life.

The Justice (retd) Ajit Prakash Shah panel has told the government that privacy was only a "narrow exception" to the citizens' right of information.

And when someone claimed exemption from providing information on grounds of privacy, the Information Commissioners used the public interest test to determine whether "the individual's right to privacy should be trumped by the public's right to information", the Shah panel said.

The panel's recommendations come weeks after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh spoke about concerns regarding possible infringement of personal privacy while providing information under the Right to Information Act.

Singh had gone a step further to stress that "citizens' right to know should definitely be circumscribed if disclosure of information encroaches upon someone's personal privacy. But where to draw the line is a complicated question".

The Shah panel - that had only three civil society members, NDTV's Barkha Dutt, researcher Dr Usha Ramanathan and Pranesh Prakash of advocacy group, Centre for Internet & Society - has indicated there was no need for concern.

"The (proposed) Privacy Act should not circumscribe the Right to Information Act," the Shah panel said, pointing that there were more than 400 cases where the Central Information Commissioner had pronounced decisions on the balance between privacy and transparency.

Singh's remarks at the convention to mark the seventh anniversary of the RTI Act - that reflected the discomfort within sections of the government at the use of the transparency law - had come in for severe criticism from RTI activists.

Instead, the panel listed out nearly six dozen laws or those in the pipeline that contained provisions impacting privacy.

Government officials said many of these laws or their rules would need to be fine-tuned in line with privacy principles, particularly those relating to the financial sector and the two big databases of residents being created by the home ministry's National Population Register and the Unique Identification Authority of India's Aadhaar.

User avatar
dheerajjain
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 2010
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: Delhi

Return to RTI Section

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron