Join us on Facebook
Become a GFWA member

Site Announcements

Invitation to RPS SAVANA Allottees to join Case in NCDRC against RPS Infrastructures Ltd


Have you submitted a rating and reviewed your project?
Rate & Review your project now! Submit your project and review.
Read Reviews! Share your feedback!


** Enhanced EDC Stayed by High Court **

Forum email notifications...Please read !
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to Noida
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to GGN


Advertise with us

Greater Faridabad Welfare Association meetings and important events information section

How close is your dream home to reality

100 %
1
3%
80%
5
14%
60%
12
34%
Lesser
17
49%
 
Total votes : 35

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby sendtomanish » Thu May 19, 2011 11:50 am

Sorry typo,msg is for Naveen!
User avatar
sendtomanish
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby naveen » Thu May 19, 2011 12:20 pm

Thanks Manish,

In which thread has he posted?
User avatar
naveen
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:40 pm

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby pankajsingh.af » Thu May 19, 2011 12:31 pm

Some correction to details posted by nitinomaxe. I am providing these corrections wiht respect to Omaxe Heights Sec 86, if nitin has posted details for Omaxe new heights then that holds true.


For Omaxe Heights Sec 86 Project:

Project name _____________________ OMAXE HEIGHTS
Draw held for Pre Launch customers: 14 Oct 2006 for 630 3BHK Flats and 1068 2BHK Flats
Project launch date (MMM-YYYY) __________________ 13 Nov 2006
Promised delivery period (MMM-YYYY)__________________ 30+ 6(months grace period) from the Agreement date

Tentative possesion dates given by Omaxe Care has changed always
-Tentative possesion date by Jan 2010 as told by Omaxe Customer care in Sep 2009.
-Tentative possesion date by June 2010 when enquired in Feb 2010.
-Tentative possesion date by July 2010 when enquired in Mar 2010.
-Tentative possesion date by Sep 2010 when enquired in May 2010.
-Tentative possesion date by Dec 2010 when enquired in Aug 2010.
- On personal visit to the site on 01 Mar 2011, It is now being told that the possesion is
likely to be given out for 3 BHK flats after 8-10 months for Oscar tower.

- Complaint filed with Consumer Coordination Council on 06 Aug 2010, complaint ID 15563/3/2010, but no response from the builder to the Council

- Increase in supper area by without informing customer, they have made a Podium just to provide covered parking and now that is beign charged to customers as increased common area.


Regards,
Pankaj Singh
User avatar
pankajsingh.af
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:06 pm

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby mdmk_family » Thu May 19, 2011 2:00 pm

Project name : Princess Park Project, Sector 86, Faridabad

Project launch date (MMM-YYYY) : June 2005

Promised delivery period (MMM-YYYY) : Not applicable. Builder has not yet signed the agreement

Tentative/Expected Delivery (MMM-YYYY) : Feb 2012

What is the penalty rate (x rs per sq ft) : No information. (Builder ha snot yet signed the agreement)

Have you started to receive penalty payments as promised in agreement (Y/N) : N

Please provide rate of Interest for delayed payment : 15%

Amount of Green Area Promised (% Green) : No information

Expected Amount of Green area in actual (%age) : No information

Did you requested for sanctioned layout from Builder (Y/N) : Y

Did you received sanctioned layout from your builder (Y/N) : N

Is Super Area found to be changed at time of possession (Y/N along with +/- SQFT change) : NA (Possession yet not offered)

In case of Possession received, Are appropriate approvals and NOC received (Y/N) : NA

Specific Construction Quality/Safety Issues (You would like to bring attention) : Not at present. (Construction still under progress)

Previous meetings with Builder/STP /Authorities approached so far (preferably authority name/DD-MM-YYYY More than 40 letters and E-mails have been sent to BPTP. No worthwhile response has been received. The main issues are as below :-

1. At the time of booking, BPTP promised allotment on first cum first serve basis. Arbitrarily it changed the criteria to computerized draw system to favour its own brokers.

2. Inspite of being the earliest applicants BPTP allotted 19th floor in Tower ‘D’ and mislead us by saying that it would have the terrace rights.

3. Later on when we represented it offered allotment on 4th floor in Tower ‘A’. However, it levied the condition of PLC which should not have been since as per the original application we had requested for first and second floor. Further on the website also there is no mention of PLC for above 3rd floor.

4. BPTP has been raising demand notices for interest for the so called delayed payment whereas the delay is attributable due to wrong allotment of BPTP.

5. An amount of Rs. 11,63,500/- has been paid to BPTP during the period Sept 2005 to Feb 2009. The payment have been stopped thereafter because of unfair demand of interset from BPTP regarding interest.

6. No agreement has been yet signed for the payment already made to BPTP due to inaction of BPTP.

7. BPTP has placed an online customer support system on the website but actually there is no action on the request/queries that is placed through this mechanism.

8. BPTP has flouted the regulations by

a) Accepting payments from consumers even though there was no sanction for the building plan.

b) Changing the building plans on design without any consent from the consumers

c) Excessive delay in construction resulting in a situation that even after 6 years of launch of the project possessions are yet to be offered.

d) Lack of any grievance redressal policy in the orgainsation

e) No nodal officer has been appointed for redressal of complaints of consumers.

f) EDCs have been calculated for the development charges but the roads/sewerages are still not in place. In fact HUDA has not even acquired the land for master road. Thus BPTP was wrong in collecting EDC’s from consumers when there was no development on the ground.


Maya Devi
0129-4010670, 9818433670
User avatar
mdmk_family
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:32 pm

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby ashish » Thu May 19, 2011 2:51 pm

Project name : Princess Park Project, Sector 86, Faridabad

Project launch date (MMM-YYYY) : June 2009

Promised delivery period (MMM-YYYY) : Not applicable. Builder has not yet signed the agreement

Tentative/Expected Delivery (MMM-YYYY) : 2012

What is the penalty rate (x rs per sq ft) : 5

Have you started to receive penalty payments as promised in agreement (Y/N) : NA as all payments were made on time

Please provide rate of Interest for delayed payment : 15%

Amount of Green Area Promised (% Green) : No information

Expected Amount of Green area in actual (%age) : No information

Did you requested for sanctioned layout from Builder (Y/N) : Y

Did you received sanctioned layout from your builder (Y/N) : N

Is Super Area found to be changed at time of possession (Y/N along with +/- SQFT change) : NA (Possession yet not offered)

In case of Possession received, Are appropriate approvals and NOC received (Y/N) : NA as possession not yet received.

Specific Construction Quality/Safety Issues (You would like to bring attention) : Not at present. (Construction still under progress)

Previous meetings with Builder/STP /Authorities approached so far (preferably authority name/DD-MM-YYYY Numerous letters and E-mails have been sent to BPTP. No worthwhile response has been received.


The main issues are as below :-

1. No clarity by Builder on the possession date for the tower M.
2. No clarity by Builder on the status of infrastructure like water, road , electricity.
3. No clarity provided by Builder on penalty payment due to late delivery, inspite of giving a written letter approx 2 months back.
4. No clarity on the overall plan having green area, club, shops, shools as intially conceptualized when selling this project.

Thanks,
Ashish
9811272113
User avatar
ashish
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby jags.singh » Thu May 19, 2011 4:27 pm

Sorry for the typo below is the correct date

Project name ___________________OMAXE SPA VILLAGE, SECTOR-78
Project launch date (MMM-YYYY) __________________NOV 2008
Promised delivery period (MMM-YYYY)__________________MAR 2012 (As per old agreement)
Tentative/Expected Delivery (MMM-YYYY) __________________ JUL 2012 (As per new agreement. New agreement was made due to some issue faced at the time of loan with old agreement)

Regards,
Jagbir Singh
User avatar
jags.singh
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:07 am

Re: Details Needed for Joint Meeting with Builders

Postby sayan1556 » Sat May 21, 2011 11:25 am

Project name _____________________ BPTP PARK ELITE FLOOR
Project launch date (MMM-YYYY) __________________ MAY-2009
Promised delivery period (MMM-YYYY)__________________DEC 2011 (@ BBA)
Tentative/Expected Delivery (MMM-YYYY) __________________ DEC 2011

what is the penality rate (x rs per sqft)__________________ 5/-
Have you started to receive penality payments as promised in agreement (Y/N)__________________NA

Please provide rate of Interest for delayed payment__________________18%
Amount of Green Area Promised (% Green)__________________DONT KNOW
Expected Amount of Green area in actual (%age)__________________ NO IDEA, BUT LOOKS OK

Did you requested for sanctioned layout from Builder (Y/N)__________________NO
Did you received sanctioned layout from your builder (Y/N)__________________NA


Is Super Area found to be changed at time of possession (Y/N along with +/- SQFT change)__________________NO (SO FAR)
In case of Possession received, Are appropriate approvals and NOC received (Y/N)__________________

Specific Construction Quality/Safety Issues (You would lik eto bring attention)__________________ CONSTRUCTION QUALITY APPEARS AS GOOD, BUT THEY HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANTI SKID TILES IN BALCONY AS PER SPEC IN BBA.
Previous meetings with Builder/STP /Authorities approached so far (preferably authority name/DD-MM-YYYY)__________________ NOT DONE
User avatar
sayan1556
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:56 pm

Previous

Return to Events & Meets

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron