Join us on Facebook
Become a GFWA member

Site Announcements

Invitation to RPS SAVANA Allottees to join Case in NCDRC against RPS Infrastructures Ltd


Have you submitted a rating and reviewed your project?
Rate & Review your project now! Submit your project and review.
Read Reviews! Share your feedback!


** Enhanced EDC Stayed by High Court **

Forum email notifications...Please read !
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to Noida
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to GGN


Advertise with us

Share your views and experience.

Is Supreme Court biased towards builders?

Postby dheerajjain » Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:38 pm

Supreme Court has again overturned decision of High Court and given decision in favor of realtor. Previously also, Supreme Court has given some controversional decisions in favor of big real estate players which are quoted by each official of DTCP/HUDA to defend non-action against builders. Surprisingly, SC said '' ...irrespective of the (booking) amount, the purchaser (builder) is entitled to forfeit the entire sum". It has to be noted that draft Real Estate Regaulatory Bill, 2012 puts the limit on booking amount as 10%.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-new ... 50200.aspx

Hindustan Times, 26th Oct

Earnest money paid by a purchaser of an immovable property can be forfeited by the seller if the former fails to pay the remaining sum, the Supreme Court has held.
A bench of Justice KS Radhakrishnan and Justice Dipak Misra said the earnest money is given to bind the contract and the seller is entitled to forfeit it if the sale of an immovable property falls through due to the fault of the purchaser.

“Earnest money is paid or given at the time when the contract is entered into and as a pledge for its due performance by the depositor and it is to be forfeited in case of non-performance by the depositor,” the bench said.

The bench gave the ruling setting aside a Delhi High Court order, which had held that the seller is entitled to forfeit only a nominal amount and not the entire sum.

The bench said irrespective of the amount, the purchaser is entitled to forfeit the entire sum.

“There can be converse situation also that if the seller fails to perform the contract, the

purchaser can also get the double the amount, if it is so stipulated.”

The court passed the order on a man’s plea against the high court’s order directing him to forfeit only a nominal amount of R50,000 out of R7 lakh earnest money paid by a purchaser after he failed to pay the rest of R63 lakh to get the property.

User avatar
dheerajjain
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 2010
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: Delhi

Return to Expert Opinions

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest

cron