Join us on Facebook
Become a GFWA member

Site Announcements

Invitation to RPS SAVANA Allottees to join Case in NCDRC against RPS Infrastructures Ltd


Have you submitted a rating and reviewed your project?
Rate & Review your project now! Submit your project and review.
Read Reviews! Share your feedback!


** Enhanced EDC Stayed by High Court **

Forum email notifications...Please read !
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to Noida
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to GGN


Advertise with us

Online resident community forum to connect with all members of SRS Residency Faridabad, Sector 88

SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby sendtomanish » Sat May 21, 2011 8:30 pm

SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment
1. DC has taken serious note on pressurizing by builder and at the time of possession, taking sign on forceful undertaking to forgive penalty in lieu of Rs 9390(6 month free maintenance).DC has immediately instructed to DTP to issue show cause to SRS and advise home buyers to not sign on any such documents and complain immediately to DTP and copy to DC by registered post with proof of your final payment and your issue.
DC said-“No one is above rule of law and no builder can force to sign any illegitimate documents to homebuyers.”

2. DC said every builder will have to honor the penalty contract as per agreement and if builder is charging 24% interest to buyers, with same formula they need to return/adjust penalty to home buyers with bank interest. Under DC instruction and pressure Omaxe, BPTP, Piyush immediately promised and agreed for penalty refund.
DC clear action and instructions revived hope to SRS buyers to get back penalty amount and so those who have not taken possession are advised not to sign on any forceful undertaking and lodge a written complaint with DTP and copy to DC for your concern and demand of penalty from builders.

3. Those who have taken possession and compelled to sign on forceful undertaking to take flat possession/shift flat, we are still fighting for them and for their penalty amount refund which is very substantial amount . For 2 BHK it is 1,43,440 and interest 63112=2,06,552 and for 3 BHK, it would be around 171270 + 73357=2,44,627.

4. Every buyers should write your individual complain to DTP and copy to DC asap.
Please refer below thread for same.
post3523.html#p3523
Once you send your complain, please send scanned copy on mail for GFWA records.
Please send your complain to DTP and DC asap ,each complain should be addressed seperately.The more complaint DC have,better chance of quicker action.DC has promised one-to-one builder meeting if complaint against particular builder(SRS) is more.

5. For any issue/guidance, please feel free to mail on or,/call to anyone:-
Manish: manish.gupta@myfaridabad.in;9891239112
Alok Gupta: alokgupta572@hotmail.com;9212106534
Narender Chabra:- narender.chhabra@myfaridabad.in ;9810360936
Dharmender Kumar: dharmender.kumar@myfaridabad.in;9810368631
Raja Roy Chowdhary: rajarc@gmail.com;9899709338
Kumud Ranjan: replytokumud@gmail.com;9971155126
User avatar
sendtomanish
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby kumarashish » Sun May 22, 2011 11:15 pm

Thanks to Manish for keeping points for SRS with DC. Few days ago I came to know that few people from SRS who have already taken possession have complaint that Manish and other guys have not helped him/them. I think now they should not have complaint (Ref point 3 as mentioned above). Befre this meeting when we met HUDA administrator for the development of Naherpar, we had expectation that at least people who were already shifted, will must attend the meeting to share their concern. At that time we had little disappointment. I would like to say again thanks to Manish and other guy for their dedication. We need to come together for a bright future of Naherpar. I request you all to please write your individual complain to DTP and copy to DC.
User avatar
kumarashish
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:56 pm

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby s3kumar6 » Sat May 28, 2011 12:58 am

Hi Guys,

I think due to pathetic laws and corrupt burecacy we mid-segment families are getting crushed each day. Each day we have to starve with difficult situations due to builders, officials, Private Jobs, or increasing loan rates, paying heavy interests, unnecessary delays.

I have a flat in C-6 tower, and I went to the SRS Residency recently I was surprised to see what was promised and what is happening. If you are making delay in payment they are charging heavy interest rates between 18 to 24 percent.

I still dont see that I can get possession of My flat in C-6 tower in next 2 years.

Along with paying EMIs and Rent its becoming almost difficult to manage the budget. I took the loan at approx 8.7% interest rate and now it has become 10.5% and even there is no hope of getting the possession.

For me its like no option left what to do.

I think like me there are other folks who will be having same situation or who may have suffered the same situation.

I can say atleast this is good with those few folks who have got allotment...and we must do something to stop these kind of MAL PRACTICES.
User avatar
s3kumar6
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby VishalBansal » Sat May 28, 2011 10:27 am

SRS has started construction of school in front of C6 Tower in place of Green Area for which PLC has been charged, and above all, not even ready to refund PLC. Great Builder.
Nursing home is also under plan and but where it will come, no idea.
Shoping complex is shifted to some other green area as D Tower is comming at orginal Shooping Complex location.
So School, Nurisng Home and Shoping complex will be on green area. Thanks to Builder as childern will not have enough playing area and they will spend time on studies. As per builder, School, nursing home are beneift of Flat owners, so no one should not have any objection for it.
My suggestion to builder, also provide, Bank ,Police station, multi specailty hopsital and even cremation ground in premises that will helpfull to flat owners and make sure no space for play area so that all children from SRS will be topper. What a caring builder.

D Tower will take atleast 3 year to complete. It means whole project will take atleast 3 years to get complete. As per Builder, registry will start only after the completion of project. It mean no registry for flat for atleast next 3 years and regsitry charges & EDC will be at escalated circle price. No money with you, it means no chance, children will get spoil.

All 3 Lifts are not insatalled and Builder has started charging maintenace charge. How the Builder can take maintenance charge without completion of Tower. I think SRS is Rajnikant, who can do much above your Imganiation.



SRS is a builder or something else.
User avatar
VishalBansal
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:23 pm

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby ssp142000 » Sat May 28, 2011 11:17 am

Hi Jayant,

How are we doing in terms of funds. Do we have substantial funds to hire the best solicitors' to represent our case against HUDA, Buliders' and related Govt. bodies in the court of Law?

We have already brought to the notice of District Administrators the fraud that is going on which is evident.

I can assure that soon a time will come when we will have to proceed legally.

Hope most of the members must have contributed and will contribute for this common right. I hope if we move towards the right directions we will be able to make Faridabad among the best cities with all amenities' a modern literate socity should have.
Thanks

Shamsher
User avatar
ssp142000
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:19 am
Location: Faridabad

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby VishalBansal » Sat May 28, 2011 11:53 am

If my any information is wrong regaridng SRS residency , builder is most invited to give clarifcation on the issue of School, Nursing Home and Shopping coplex.
User avatar
VishalBansal
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:23 pm

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby sendtomanish » Sat May 28, 2011 1:16 pm

Dear S3Kumar6,Thanks for your valueable post..We all are on same boat...Please send your complaint asap to my mail id to be submitted to DC/DTP.
Dear Vishal:-You are right,Supreme court sayd the browchure given to buyer as time of agreement is extension of builder-buyer contract,but SRS is changing deviating lot from its approved plan...SRS people needs to wake up and verify.
User avatar
sendtomanish
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby sendtomanish » Sat May 28, 2011 6:20 pm

Dear SRS User,
Please donwload SRS Template,fill your Flat details wherever necessary and send it to me by Monday 7 pm as per DTP/DC instructions.
If you have any other,please send mail to me with your concern.
Regards
Manish
You do not have the required permission to view the files attached to this post. Read FAQs
Or you must LOGIN or REGISTER to view these files.
User avatar
sendtomanish
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 am

Complaint Submission to DC against SRS Real Estate Ltd

Postby sendtomanish » Sun May 29, 2011 12:07 am

Friends,

As you all are aware, During our meeting with DC on 20th May, we were requested to submit our individual complaints in the DC office, DTP Sanjeev Maan has requested that all these individual complaints should come on GFWA letterhead and they would keepGFWA in loop in any action taken in this regard

Refer Thread : submit-your-written-complaints-with-documentary-proofs-asap-to-dtp-faridabad-t635.html

Myself,Rajajee,Alokjee and Dharmenderjee are in process of compiling complaints for SRS Residency, All those who would be interested in having there complaints registered to DC, Are requested to do any one of below options:-

-Either send me filled template which can be downloaded frm above attachment
-Or either revert on forum or send me an email, with following details

Mail Marked to : manish.gupta at myfaridabad.in , rajarc at gmail.com
CC :alokgupta572 at hotmail.com,dharmender.kumar at myfaridabad.in

Subject : Complaint Submission against SRS Real Estate Limited

In your email, Please provide following details
*******************************************************************************

I would like to submit a complaint to District Commissioner against SRS Real Estate Limited. My details are as under

Name :
Flat Number :
Address:
Phone Number :

*******************************************************************************

Once the details are compiled, we will share a copy of complaint letters to the people who have responded.

Please hurry up, We intend to submit our letters by 30th or 31st of this month.
User avatar
sendtomanish
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: SRS can’t take forceful undertaking in lieu of penalty adjustment

Postby waniejaz123@yahoo.com » Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:31 pm

Hello All,

I have send a complaint letter to DC/DTP office through registered posts. What next step i should follow . pls help

Regards,
Ejaz Wani
User avatar
waniejaz123@yahoo.com
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:49 pm


Return to SRS Residency

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron