Join us on Facebook
Become a GFWA member

Site Announcements

Invitation to RPS SAVANA Allottees to join Case in NCDRC against RPS Infrastructures Ltd


Have you submitted a rating and reviewed your project?
Rate & Review your project now! Submit your project and review.
Read Reviews! Share your feedback!


** Enhanced EDC Stayed by High Court **

Forum email notifications...Please read !
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to Noida
Carpool from Greater Faridabad to GGN


Advertise with us

All updates regarding SAVANA

Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby webmaster » Sat May 28, 2011 8:06 pm

Friends

As you all are aware, During our meeting with DC on 20th May, we were requested to submit our individual complaints in the DC office, DTP Sanjeev Maan has requested that all these individual complaints should come on GFWA letterhead and they would keep GFWA in loop in any action taken in this regard

Refer Thread : submit-your-written-complaints-with-documentary-proofs-asap-to-dtp-faridabad-t635.html

Myself and Sanjeev are in process of compiling complaints for RPS Savana, All those who would be interested in having there complaints registered to DC, Are requested to either revert on forum or send me an email, with following details :

Mail Marked to : s1joshi @gmail.com , sanjeev2111 @hotmail.com
CC : vineetmis at gmail.com

Subject : Complaint Submission against RPS Infrastructure Limited

In your email, Please provide following details
*******************************************************************************

I would like to submit a complaint to District Commissioner against RPS infrastructure Limited. My details are as under

Name :
Flat Number :
Address:
Phone Number :

*******************************************************************************

Once the details are compiled, we will share a copy of complaint letters to the people who have responded.

Please hurry up, We intend to submit our letters by 30th or 31st of this month.

Regards
Seema
User avatar
webmaster
Site ADMIN
Site ADMIN
 
Posts: 950
Images: 56
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:24 pm
Location: New Delhi

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby s1joshi » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:15 am

A total of 430 complaints were submitted to District Town Planner and District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited on Monday 06 June 2011. The issues were surrounding following areas

    01 Significant and Intentional Delay in construction
    02 Misrepresentation of Fact and duping Customers
    03-Violating Law by Sale before project sanction
    04-Not Sharing Project layout
    05-Inferior Construction Quality
    06-Cheating in name of PLC
    07-Not Allowing Site Visit
    08-Not Paying Penality despite delay
    09-Sharing amenities with other project
    10-Voilating Supreme Court judgement by selling open/slit Parking and other common area

We have raised these issues with DC and DTP offices earlier as well several times, and based on the response of DC during 20th May meeting, this entire exercise was carried out to submit all issues once again with individual supporting, This was a long exercise and all the supporting proofs have been shared with DC and DTP, Hope the authorities empathize with the situation of customers and take strict action against the guilty.
User avatar
s1joshi
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Delhi

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby murlik » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:21 am

Seema Ji

I had also forwarded a mail to you listing the complaints against RPS, Kindly confirm if my name is also in the list. Also if possible mail list of 430 complainant, with their mail id's. 430 nos is quite impressive. well done

murlik
T-12, Sapphireberry, RPS Savana, Flat 903
User avatar
murlik
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 6:41 am

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby mnhasan » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:53 pm

The following were the amenities committed to provide but not a single amenity seems to be provided as the project is delayed by at least two years. we had booked in 2007 and the builder committed to give possession in 30 months but the scenario is quite different as even 50% construction work has not been completed so far more over they are not concerned of their commitments and work is slow or u can say no significant developments are seen at the project sight.

50 Acres of Green AREA to bring you closer to nature. -----NOT SEEN (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Majestic Entrance with Landscaping & Fountains. -----NOT SEEN (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Metro Rail Connectivity. ----NOT SEEMS TO BE CONNECTED AS NEAREST METRO STATION IS ATLEAST 4-5 KM AWAW FROM KLJ GREENS(WRONG COMMITMENT)

Nearby Noida Express highway. NO CONSTRUCTION WORK IS THERE FOR EXPRESSWAY (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

On western Periphery Road. NO WESTERN PERIPHERAL ROAD (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Layout based on Vaastu Shastra. NO COMMENT

World Class Amenties. IT IS VAGUE, WHAT TYPE OF WORLD CLASS AMENITIES WILL BE PROVIDEDCAN NOT BE SAID (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Round the Clock Security. TIME WILL SAY

Health Care Centre. NO LAND LEFT SPARE FOR THIS (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Earthquake Resistance RCC Frame Structure. ONLY EXPERT CAN COMMENT

Dedicated Car Park for Each Apartment. WE PAID Rs.125000/-(VIOLATION OF SC RULING)(WRONG INTERPRETATION)

Swimming Pool. SIGHT FOR THIS NOT DECLARED SO FAR.(WRONG COMMITTMENT)

On-Site ATM. MAY OR MAY NOT,TIME WILL DECIDE

Aerobics Room. SIGHT NOT DECLARED SO FAR

Nursery School. NO LAND DECLARED OR LEFT WITHIN THIS PROJECT.(TOTALLY WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Power Back-up. MAY OR MAY NOT ,CAN NOT BE SAID AT THIS JUNCTION

Fire Safety Complaint. NOT CLEAR TILL TIME

High Speed Elivators. MAY OR MAY NOT BE PROVIDED,NOTHING CAN BE SAID

Jogging Trails. WRONG COMMITTMENT

Community Hall. NO SITE DECLARED SO FAR

International Standard Club House. WE PAID RS.40000/- FOR THIS BUT HOPELESS

THANKING YOU,

M N HASAN
KLJ GREENS,SEC-77,FBD
9899027860
Do not reply to this email. This is an automated message sent from myFaridabad Forum.
User avatar
mnhasan
Official Member
Official Member
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:36 am

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against KLJ DE

Postby mnhasan » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:20 pm

The following were the amenities committed to provide but not a single amenity seems to be provided as the project is delayed by at least two years. we had booked in 2007 and the builder committed to give possession in 30 months but the scenario is quite different as even 50% construction work has not been completed so far more over they are not concerned of their commitments and work is slow or u can say no significant developments are seen at the project sight.

50 Acres of Green AREA to bring you closer to nature. -----NOT SEEN (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Majestic Entrance with Landscaping & Fountains. -----NOT SEEN (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Metro Rail Connectivity. ----NOT SEEMS TO BE CONNECTED AS NEAREST METRO STATION IS ATLEAST 4-5 KM AWAW FROM KLJ GREENS(WRONG COMMITMENT)

Nearby Noida Express highway. NO CONSTRUCTION WORK IS THERE FOR EXPRESSWAY (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

On western Periphery Road. NO WESTERN PERIPHERAL ROAD (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Layout based on Vaastu Shastra. NO COMMENT

World Class Amenties. IT IS VAGUE, WHAT TYPE OF WORLD CLASS AMENITIES WILL BE PROVIDEDCAN NOT BE SAID (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Round the Clock Security. TIME WILL SAY

Health Care Centre. NO LAND LEFT SPARE FOR THIS (WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Earthquake Resistance RCC Frame Structure. ONLY EXPERT CAN COMMENT

Dedicated Car Park for Each Apartment. WE PAID Rs.125000/-(VIOLATION OF SC RULING)(WRONG INTERPRETATION)

Swimming Pool. SIGHT FOR THIS NOT DECLARED SO FAR.(WRONG COMMITTMENT)

On-Site ATM. MAY OR MAY NOT,TIME WILL DECIDE

Aerobics Room. SIGHT NOT DECLARED SO FAR

Nursery School. NO LAND DECLARED OR LEFT WITHIN THIS PROJECT.(TOTALLY WRONG COMMITTMENT)

Power Back-up. MAY OR MAY NOT ,CAN NOT BE SAID AT THIS JUNCTION

Fire Safety Complaint. NOT CLEAR TILL TIME

High Speed Elivators. MAY OR MAY NOT BE PROVIDED,NOTHING CAN BE SAID

Jogging Trails. WRONG COMMITTMENT

Community Hall. NO SITE DECLARED SO FAR

International Standard Club House. WE PAID RS.40000/- FOR THIS BUT HOPELESS

THANKING YOU,

M N HASAN
KLJ GREENS,SEC-77,FBD
9899027860
Do not reply to this email. This is an automated message sent from myFaridabad Forum.
User avatar
mnhasan
Official Member
Official Member
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:36 am

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby dheerajjain » Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:51 am

Seema Ji, Media people are listening to you. Forum is now popular among media and Dainik Bhaskar, most read newspaper in Haryana has come out with article below. I deeply appreciate Daink Bhaskar for their continous support.

http://www.bhaskar.com/article/har-oth- ... l?ZX3-UPD=
User avatar
dheerajjain
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 2010
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: Delhi

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby sanjeev2111 » Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:43 pm

Great going to all people who participated in the process of making their complaints against RPS Management.

Now, we may need another one or two such acts to wake up all Authorities in FBD.

Sanjeev
User avatar
sanjeev2111
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:06 am

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby webmaster » Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:43 pm

Response has been received from RPS Group against the complaints submitted to DTP.

As expected, they have denied any wrong doing on their part and says everything is as approved plan and commitment.

Interesting point to note at the end of the response to DTP..

Before concluding the reply, it is pertinent to mention that only a group of customers is habitual of making false complaints as they firstly filed their complaints to Hon’ble DTP Faridabad, then to the Mediation Center, Govt. of Delhi and then to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Delhi, none of the complaints could sustain being devoid of merits.
You do not have the required permission to view the files attached to this post. Read FAQs
Or you must LOGIN or REGISTER to view these files.
User avatar
webmaster
Site ADMIN
Site ADMIN
 
Posts: 950
Images: 56
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:24 pm
Location: New Delhi

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby sanchay » Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:28 pm

Dear Jayanta,

I have gone through the reply from RPS to DTP. RPS has referred to Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975 & Bye-Laws of the State Government.

1. What is DTP's reaction to the reply?
2. Can we ask for a copy of the laws mentioned in the reply from DTP or some other authority?

RPS does seem to be grossly irritated seeing us united.
I sincerely appreciate the good work done by you for providing the common platform and other active members for working tirelessly towards common interest.
--
Warm Regards,
Sanchay Pal
Ph.: +966-563948013
Email ID: sanchay.pal@gmail.com
User avatar
sanchay
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:21 pm
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Re: Refer National Building Code 2005 instead old acts

Postby rky0111 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:02 pm

All home buyers should refer the National Building Code 2005 instead a very old acts. NBC 2005 is more relevent in terms of high rise buildings and applicable to whole country since its inception. This my advise to all and it can dounloaded from the net. NBC 2005 contains every tit and bits of construction inductry in detail. The builders, in their reply to DTP is citing acts as per their benefits not as per the latest act NBC 2005, which is the Bible for this industry.
User avatar
rky0111
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 6:22 pm

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby sanchay » Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:19 pm

Dear All,

I was able to find Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975 on website india.gov.in which seems credible. I am trying to go through it and understand the implications.

Source URL: http://india.gov.in/allimpfrms/allacts/1907.pdf

Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975.pdf
You do not have the required permission to view the files attached to this post. Read FAQs
Or you must LOGIN or REGISTER to view these files.
--
Warm Regards,
Sanchay Pal
Ph.: +966-563948013
Email ID: sanchay.pal@gmail.com
User avatar
sanchay
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:21 pm
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby sirohionline » Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:48 pm

To
DCP (Kind Attention)
South East District, Mathura Rd
Sarita Vihar Police Station
New Delhi 110076 16 Aug 14


COMPLAINT OF FRAUD & CHEATING
AGAINST RPS BUILDER
Sir

1. I took this opportunity to write to you in view of a number of complaints being filed against Mr RC Gupta , MD, RPS infrastructure Ltd and their Board of Directors having their office at :-

1117 – 1120, 11 Floor
Tower “B” DLF Towers
Jasola District Centre
New Delhi - 110025

2. The Coy is managed by team of poorly reputed builders operating in the local areas of Greater Faridabad. This was suppose to be their second project for which even after 8 yrs they are still struggling for approvals and planning what to do inspite of 95% of amount has been collected from 2300 families that are planned to stay in the said township . There are various malpractices being followed by this builder

(a) Deviating from Layout plans and approvals without knowledge of Buyers by selling stilt parking as ground floor houses at hefty prices and commercial spaces created out of parks /open areas.

(b) Sudden increase in super area from the initial plans and layout leading to additional revenue of Rs 60,000 -95000 per occupant.

(c) Exorbitant charges on account of Free Parking spaces, which is neither existing nor earmarked.

(d) Collection of Enhanced EDC of Rs1.41 Lakhs through Fraudulent ways even when stay by Haryana court.



(e) Threatening the customers of time constraints and collecting money at heavy rate of interest of 24%, forcefully and fraudulently

(f) Hidden charges to the tune of 5.0 Lakhs in last instalments being imposed

(g) Delayed penalty to buyers of Rs 3.81 lakhs is denied

3. It has been observed that the builder does not respond to any queries and issues of the customers. The phone lines are not being attended to and entry to the office has been made strictly on the required basis through private security guards. Presently none of the following directors are approachable or contactable giving the symptoms of bankruptcy and ill intensions of the coy :-

(a) Sh S C Gupta & Sh RC Gupta (Chairman & MD)
(b) Mr Pradeep Seth CEO
(c) Mr Anshu Singhal , President
(d) Mr Vinay Kakkar , Vice President
(e) Mr Rajesh Jain , DGM Mkg

4. It seems the builder has no fear of the law, system or administration. He has made a self style well drafted agreement, which is Fake and biased with no legal backing, just to protect himself. Local reputation, prevailing corruption and time consuming judiciary has made his job a lucrative business of 21 century. If immediate steps not taken this will set a wrong example to the respected citizens of the country and encouragement to fake builders who will use the same tactics again and again.

5. In view of the poor credibility of this builder and non payment of salaries to his staff, it is perceived that he may vacate the existing rented accommodation any time and vanish duping hundred of crores of money of innocent govt and retired people of our nation.

6. Inspite of repeated notices, the builder is not ready to take any corrective steps. There are indications on net and various forums as a warning against this builder. The case is also being projected to various other govt agencies and court for necessary help & penalising this builder.

7. In view of above, as a timely support, may I request you to pl issue instructions on the subject for necessary investigation and file an FIR under section 420 for Fraud & cheating, 120B for criminal conspiracy & 408 for breach of trust against the members of RPS Group.

Copy to: District Magistrate
12/1, Jamnagar House
Shahjahan Road
New Delhi -110011
User avatar
sirohionline
GFWA Member
GFWA Member
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Ghaziabad

Re: Complaint Submission to District Commissioner against RPS Infrastructure Limited

Postby anjali » Sat Dec 26, 2015 3:55 pm

Dear Members

I have been reading posts about all the effort being put in to fight for what was promised to us, wish to understand if there has been any success in fighting with RPS since most buyers continue to get unjustified demand letters with VAT, penalties etc

Hope to get some update from others please

Anjali
9818231938
User avatar
anjali
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:40 am


Return to SAVANA News

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest